
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
2015Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) and Tesla M60

GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,366 points. Launch price was $395.82.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) scores 7,366 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) leads by 5.2%. The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.358 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,366+5% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.358 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz+3% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (2nd Gen) (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (2nd Gen) | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-67% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 73.7+216% | 23.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












