
GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
2016Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) better than Tesla M40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 115 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) and Tesla M40

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,465 points. Launch price was $389.99.

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) scores 10,465 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 6.738 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,465+2% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3072+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.738 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+48% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.1 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) draws 120W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-52% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 87.2+113% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel) | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Codename | GP104B | GM200 |
| Release | August 15 2016 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #247 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












