
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
- ❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
- ❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 Embedded GPU and Tesla M40 24GB

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU scores 11,009 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1140 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,009+3% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.669 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1140 MHz+3% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 192+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+82% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-86% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | 267mm |
| Height | 4mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 314.5+638% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Codename | GA107S | GM200 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #246 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












