
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+90.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 856.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,641 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅+90.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 856.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,641 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌401.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 10,641 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 90.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+91% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+58% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+137% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+50% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 192+26% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+336% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+138% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 80% less ($1601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 860.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-80% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+860% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM200 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












