
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1095.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1083.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1095.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1083.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+1% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+32% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+109% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M40 24GB has 8 GB. The Tesla M40 24GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+261% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1831 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1100% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM200 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #252 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












