
GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,451 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌264.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980
2014Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,451 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌264.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980 better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Tesla M40 24GB make more sense than GeForce GTX 980?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,077+4% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.981 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz+9% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.1 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M40 24GB has 8 GB. The Tesla M40 24GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 980 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.4+18% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 launched at $549 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 980 costs 72.5% less ($1451 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce GTX 980 offers 281.1% better value. The Tesla M40 24GB is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2+281% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GM204 | GM200 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #245 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












