
Ryzen 5 1600
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 1600
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Go across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 1600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,261).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 1600
2017Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 5 1600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z2 Go across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Z2 Go can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 12,261).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z2 Go better than Ryzen 5 1600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen Z2 Go


Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
The Ryzen 5 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,261 points. Launch price was $219.


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 1600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 1600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1600 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z2 Go (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1600 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1600 scores 12,261 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 1600. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1600 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 12,261 | 12,188 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,802 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,073 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 5 1600 versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Z2 Go — the Ryzen Z2 Go supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 1600) vs 16 (Ryzen Z2 Go) — the Ryzen 5 1600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 300 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 1600) and Rembrandt-R (Ryzen Z2 Go).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 1600) / SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). The Ryzen Z2 Go includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 5 1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | SVM |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











