
Core i7-10700KF
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z1
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-10700KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,380 vs 18,406).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $405 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z1 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i7-10700KF
2020Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,380 vs 18,406).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $405 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z1 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z1 better than Core i7-10700KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 370 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10700KF and Ryzen Z1

Core i7-10700KF
Core i7-10700KF
The Core i7-10700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,380 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1
The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10700KF packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10700KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700KF versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700KF (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-10700KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700KF scores 18,380 against the Ryzen Z1's 18,406 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Z1. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+19% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 18,380 | 18,406 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z1 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700KF | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












