
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6208U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6208U, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6208U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,480 vs 24,668).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023Xeon Gold 6208U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6208U, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,480 vs 24,668).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z1 Extreme better than Xeon Gold 6208U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z1 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6208U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Z1 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6208U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Z1 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6208U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 533 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Z1 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6208U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 577 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 612 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Z1 Extreme and Xeon Gold 6208U


Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,668 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6208U
Xeon Gold 6208U
The Xeon Gold 6208U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,480 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Z1 Extreme packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6208U offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6208U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6208U — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is built on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Z1 Extreme scores 24,668 against the Xeon Gold 6208U's 24,480 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6208U.
| Feature | Ryzen Z1 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6208U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+31% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+14% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 24,668 | 24,480 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6208U uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Z1 Extreme | Xeon Gold 6208U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












