PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9534

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 30,722).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,904 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Delivers 219.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

EPYC 9534

2022

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $5,904 less on MSRP ($2,899 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).
✅Delivers 219.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 10.1 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $8,803 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,500 vs 30,722).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.1 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($8,803 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX better than EPYC 9534?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 37.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 98.2% better Geekbench multi-core, 5.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 37.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is the better fit. You are getting 98.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $5,904 cheaper on MSRP at $2,899 MSRP versus $8,803 MSRP, and it gives you a 37.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 219.3% better value on MSRP (32.3 vs 10.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 64/128. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9534 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
1080p
low	170 FPS	314 FPS
medium	141 FPS	290 FPS
high	122 FPS	241 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	278 FPS
medium	119 FPS	231 FPS
high	97 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	191 FPS
medium	59 FPS	158 FPS
high	47 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
1080p
low	524 FPS	826 FPS
medium	457 FPS	704 FPS
high	365 FPS	548 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	431 FPS	677 FPS
medium	385 FPS	601 FPS
high	317 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	390 FPS
4K
low	265 FPS	378 FPS
medium	241 FPS	341 FPS
high	211 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	272 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
1080p
low	671 FPS	893 FPS
medium	560 FPS	724 FPS
high	522 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	454 FPS	553 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	716 FPS
medium	425 FPS	581 FPS
high	389 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	428 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	509 FPS
medium	293 FPS	420 FPS
high	262 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	312 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
1080p
low	902 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	822 FPS	1002 FPS
high	708 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	623 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	873 FPS
medium	631 FPS	769 FPS
high	540 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	461 FPS	588 FPS
4K
low	519 FPS	637 FPS
medium	464 FPS	568 FPS
high	407 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9534 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9534 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

EPYC 9534

The EPYC 9534 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 89,077 points. Launch price was $8,803.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9534 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9534 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9534 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 2.45 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9534 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9534 scores 89,077 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 — a 5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,650 vs 3,349, a 68% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,500 vs 30,722 (65.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9534 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+167%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	5.4 GHz+46%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz	4.2 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	89,077	93,660+5%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	60,336
Geekbench 6 Single	1,650	3,349+103%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,500	30,722+98%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9534 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9534 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9534) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9534) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).

Feature	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	6144 GB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9534) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9534 targets Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9534 rivals Xeon Platinum 8470; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.

Feature	EPYC 9534	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Server	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9534 launched at $8803 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX debuted at $2899. On MSRP ($8803 vs $2899), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is $5904 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9534 delivers 10.1 pts/$ vs 32.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX the 104.6% better value option.