
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 350W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (40,000 vs 44,500).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 350W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 350W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 100.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (40,000 vs 44,500).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 350W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9950X3D better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 786 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 230 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 725 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX


Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,177 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 70,177 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 3.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 44,500 vs 40,000 (10.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,398 vs 3,016, a 11.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,206 vs 23,596 (6.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+6% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 70,177+4% | 67,561 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,500+11% | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,398+13% | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,206 | 23,596+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9950X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($699 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9950X3D delivers 100.4 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 44.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $429-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.4 | 157.5+57% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












