EPYC 7573X vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 7573X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7573X

2022

Why buy it

  • +2.8% higher PassMark.
  • +1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $5,161 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1167.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 69,432).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 768 MB).
  • 25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 7573X?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is ahead with a 14.9% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X pulls ahead with 2.8% better PassMark. EPYC 7573X also has the bigger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7573X is the better fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $5,161 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $5,590 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7573X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.8% better PassMark. It is also 1167.9% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low205 FPS297 FPS
medium167 FPS270 FPS
high136 FPS223 FPS
ultra105 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low163 FPS273 FPS
medium127 FPS224 FPS
high100 FPS174 FPS
ultra79 FPS153 FPS
4K
low74 FPS187 FPS
medium61 FPS154 FPS
high48 FPS118 FPS
ultra40 FPS104 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low463 FPS786 FPS
medium407 FPS643 FPS
high329 FPS477 FPS
ultra259 FPS403 FPS
1440p
low381 FPS647 FPS
medium343 FPS549 FPS
high286 FPS422 FPS
ultra218 FPS328 FPS
4K
low234 FPS363 FPS
medium215 FPS312 FPS
high180 FPS273 FPS
ultra144 FPS230 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low865 FPS888 FPS
medium717 FPS705 FPS
high668 FPS622 FPS
ultra590 FPS534 FPS
1440p
low622 FPS713 FPS
medium514 FPS567 FPS
high472 FPS489 FPS
ultra412 FPS414 FPS
4K
low444 FPS507 FPS
medium345 FPS418 FPS
high308 FPS375 FPS
ultra249 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low992 FPS1106 FPS
medium900 FPS991 FPS
high775 FPS867 FPS
ultra671 FPS781 FPS
1440p
low767 FPS860 FPS
medium668 FPS759 FPS
high572 FPS664 FPS
ultra492 FPS576 FPS
4K
low550 FPS632 FPS
medium490 FPS562 FPS
high430 FPS496 FPS
ultra372 FPS429 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7573X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 7573X

The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7573X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+100%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz+50%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
4.5 GHz+61%
L3 Cache
768 MB (total)+1100%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Milan-X (2022)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
69,432+3%
67,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
40,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,016
Geekbench 6 Multi
23,596
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 7573X supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7573X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket
SP3
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096
2048 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7573X launched at $5590 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($5590 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $5161 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 170.8% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7573XRyzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP
$5590
$429-92%
Performance per Dollar
12.4
157.5+1170%
Release Date
2022
2025