
EPYC 7573X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,161 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1167.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 69,432).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
EPYC 7573X
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,161 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1167.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 69,432).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 7573X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 786 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 230 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 767 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7573X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X
The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7573X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 7573X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+61% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 69,432+3% | 67,561 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 7573X supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7573X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 2048 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7573X launched at $5590 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($5590 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $5161 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 170.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5590 | $429-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 157.5+1170% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












