PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9554P

2022

Why buy it

✅+9.4% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($7,104 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,205 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,104 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,104 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (95,891 vs 104,920).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 9554P

2022

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

2023

Why buy it

✅+9.4% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,205 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,104 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 14.8 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,104 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($7,104 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (95,891 vs 104,920).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX better than EPYC 9554P?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is ahead with a 25.3% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554P pulls ahead with 9.4% better PassMark. EPYC 9554P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9554P is the better fit. You are getting 9.4% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is $3,205 cheaper on MSRP at $3,899 MSRP versus $7,104 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.3% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9554P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 9.4% better PassMark. It is also 66.5% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 14.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9554P Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	171 FPS	314 FPS
medium	142 FPS	289 FPS
high	122 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	149 FPS	278 FPS
medium	120 FPS	231 FPS
high	97 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	191 FPS
medium	60 FPS	158 FPS
high	47 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 9554P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	533 FPS	807 FPS
medium	465 FPS	688 FPS
high	373 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	303 FPS	467 FPS
1440p
low	438 FPS	666 FPS
medium	392 FPS	591 FPS
high	323 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	384 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	372 FPS
medium	246 FPS	335 FPS
high	216 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	268 FPS

Open EPYC 9554P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	673 FPS	891 FPS
medium	562 FPS	723 FPS
high	523 FPS	649 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	552 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	714 FPS
medium	426 FPS	580 FPS
high	390 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	508 FPS
medium	295 FPS	419 FPS
high	263 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	311 FPS

Open EPYC 9554P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	905 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	823 FPS	1002 FPS
high	709 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	872 FPS
medium	633 FPS	768 FPS
high	541 FPS	674 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	587 FPS
4K
low	521 FPS	636 FPS
medium	465 FPS	568 FPS
high	408 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9554P Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9554P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

EPYC 9554P

The EPYC 9554P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.75 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 104,920 points. Launch price was $7,104.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9554P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9554P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.75 GHz on the EPYC 9554P versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — a 34.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9554P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9554P scores 104,920 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX's 95,891 — a 9% lead for the EPYC 9554P. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9554P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX.

Feature	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.75 GHz	5.3 GHz+41%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	4 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	104,920+9%	95,891
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	48,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,669
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	22,298

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9554P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9554P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9554P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX).

Feature	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+200%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9554P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9554P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9554P rivals Xeon 8468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	EPYC 9554P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / Single Socket	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9554P launched at $7104 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX debuted at $3899. On MSRP ($7104 vs $3899), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is $3205 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9554P delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX the 49.9% better value option.