
EPYC 7773X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+125% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
EPYC 7773X
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+125% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($6,499 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (20,000 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX better than EPYC 7773X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 920 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 955 FPS | 1160 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 742 FPS | 894 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 790 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7773X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7773X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 25% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 3.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 1,500, a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 7773X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 20,000 (76.9% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+200% | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 94,737+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 66,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536+2% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+125% | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Server | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7773X launched at $8800 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. On MSRP ($8800 vs $6499), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is $2301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX the 33.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800 | $6499-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 14.6+40% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












