
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,950 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+143.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,950 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+143.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 737 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 655 FPS |
| medium | 611 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 857 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 786 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 1215 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 926 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 820 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 951 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 828 FPS |
| high | 669 FPS | 715 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 64.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 45,000 (83.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 1,550, a 54.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 15,500 (3.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+11% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total) | 128 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 34,293 | 66,614+94% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | 45,000+143% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+74% | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | 15,500+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($449 vs $2399), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $1950 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 93.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-81% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+175% | 27.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












