PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,857 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9175F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,857 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 320W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (65,894 vs 66,614).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 512 MB).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9175F moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than EPYC 9175F?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1,857 cheaper on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $4,256 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 79.3% better value on MSRP (27.8 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, 300% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 128 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9175F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	300 FPS	224 FPS
medium	273 FPS	184 FPS
high	226 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	194 FPS
medium	227 FPS	156 FPS
high	176 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	189 FPS	94 FPS
medium	156 FPS	81 FPS
high	120 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	51 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	811 FPS	806 FPS
medium	688 FPS	684 FPS
high	539 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	655 FPS
medium	587 FPS	569 FPS
high	474 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	383 FPS
medium	333 FPS	335 FPS
high	306 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	265 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	922 FPS	812 FPS
medium	746 FPS	680 FPS
high	674 FPS	620 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	540 FPS
1440p
low	723 FPS	622 FPS
medium	582 FPS	521 FPS
high	514 FPS	470 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	405 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	451 FPS
medium	420 FPS	360 FPS
high	373 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	259 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
1080p
low	1140 FPS	1215 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	1015 FPS
high	901 FPS	926 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	820 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	951 FPS
medium	782 FPS	828 FPS
high	686 FPS	715 FPS
ultra	596 FPS	611 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	674 FPS
medium	578 FPS	605 FPS
high	513 FPS	529 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9175F Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9175F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 10.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+11%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+11%	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+300%	128 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	65,894	66,614+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	45,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,550
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the EPYC 9175F supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket	SP5	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+159900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	2048 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9175F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9175F launched at $4256 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. On MSRP ($4256 vs $2399), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $1857 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 56.8% better value option.