PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 280W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,938 vs 39,929).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌
6.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,149 MSRPvs$1,083 MSRP
❌80.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 155W.

EPYC 7313

2021

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

2020

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 280W, a 125W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,938 vs 39,929).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌
6.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,149 MSRPvs$1,083 MSRP
❌80.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX better than EPYC 7313?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is the better fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7313 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 6.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,149 MSRP versus $1,083 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7313 is also 3.5% better value on MSRP (36.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7313 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
1080p
low	166 FPS	210 FPS
medium	136 FPS	170 FPS
high	116 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	147 FPS	186 FPS
medium	118 FPS	147 FPS
high	94 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	88 FPS
medium	59 FPS	74 FPS
high	46 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	47 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
1080p
low	505 FPS	557 FPS
medium	441 FPS	486 FPS
high	354 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	415 FPS	479 FPS
medium	372 FPS	424 FPS
high	307 FPS	356 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	296 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	299 FPS
medium	233 FPS	268 FPS
high	205 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	217 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
1080p
low	665 FPS	773 FPS
medium	555 FPS	638 FPS
high	518 FPS	569 FPS
ultra	451 FPS	494 FPS
1440p
low	504 FPS	600 FPS
medium	419 FPS	495 FPS
high	385 FPS	437 FPS
ultra	333 FPS	376 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	431 FPS
medium	290 FPS	344 FPS
high	260 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	243 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
1080p
low	903 FPS	998 FPS
medium	822 FPS	970 FPS
high	708 FPS	823 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	725 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	847 FPS
medium	628 FPS	745 FPS
high	538 FPS	630 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	540 FPS
4K
low	517 FPS	594 FPS
medium	462 FPS	540 FPS
high	406 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	405 FPS

Open EPYC 7313 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7313 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7313 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — a 15% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 — a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.3 GHz+16%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.9 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+100%	64 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Castle Peak (2020)
PassMark	38,938	39,929+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,736	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,264	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).

Feature	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+209715100%	2048
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Server / High-load computing	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7313 launched at $1083 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX debuted at $1149. On MSRP ($1083 vs $1149), the EPYC 7313 is $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 36.0 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — making the EPYC 7313 the 3.4% better value option.