
EPYC 9634
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9634
2022Why buy it
- ✅+190.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅39.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,805 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 314.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.4 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,244 vs 85,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.
EPYC 9634
2022Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Why buy it
- ✅+190.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 290W instead of 350W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅39.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,805 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 314.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 43.4 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $10,304 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($10,304 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (29,244 vs 85,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌20.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 290W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9970X better than EPYC 9634?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 697 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 454 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 899 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 819 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 706 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 722 FPS | 872 FPS |
| medium | 629 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9634 and Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634
The EPYC 9634 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 84 cores and 168 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 107,944 points. Launch price was $10,304.


Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 108,377 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9634 packs 84 cores / 168 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9634 has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9634 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X (base: 2.25 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9634 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9634 scores 107,944 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X's 108,377 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 3,220, a 56.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 85,000 vs 29,244 (97.6% advantage for the EPYC 9634). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9634 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X.
| Feature | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 84 / 168+163% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 4 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+200% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 107,944 | 108,377 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 76,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,800 | 3,220+79% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 85,000+191% | 29,244 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9634 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9634 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 199.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9634) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9634) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) — the EPYC 9634 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (EPYC 9634) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X).
| Feature | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+500% | 1 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+39% | 92 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9634) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9634 targets Server/Datacenter, Ryzen Threadripper 9970X targets HEDT / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9634 rivals Xeon 8470; Ryzen Threadripper 9970X rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Server/Datacenter | HEDT / Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9634 launched at $10304 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X debuted at $2499. On MSRP ($10304 vs $2499), the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is $7805 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9634 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 43.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X the 122.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9634 | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10304 | $2499-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 43.4+313% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












