PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9474F

2022

Why buy it

✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅39.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,281 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (99,152 vs 102,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 9474F

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

2023

Why buy it

✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅39.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 92) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,281 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,780 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($6,780 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (99,152 vs 102,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7970X better than EPYC 9474F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is ahead with a 15.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9474F pulls ahead with 3.1% better PassMark. EPYC 9474F also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9474F is the better fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is $4,281 cheaper on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $6,780 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9474F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.1% better PassMark. It is also 163.1% better value on MSRP (39.7 vs 15.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9474F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	218 FPS	314 FPS
medium	179 FPS	289 FPS
high	154 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	278 FPS
medium	151 FPS	231 FPS
high	121 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	191 FPS
medium	64 FPS	158 FPS
high	50 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	615 FPS	807 FPS
medium	537 FPS	688 FPS
high	433 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	467 FPS
1440p
low	516 FPS	666 FPS
medium	459 FPS	591 FPS
high	381 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	316 FPS	384 FPS
4K
low	320 FPS	372 FPS
medium	288 FPS	335 FPS
high	258 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	268 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	787 FPS	891 FPS
medium	671 FPS	723 FPS
high	608 FPS	649 FPS
ultra	534 FPS	552 FPS
1440p
low	586 FPS	714 FPS
medium	497 FPS	580 FPS
high	443 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	423 FPS	508 FPS
medium	339 FPS	419 FPS
high	299 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	311 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	1075 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	974 FPS	1002 FPS
high	829 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	732 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	819 FPS	872 FPS
medium	717 FPS	768 FPS
high	607 FPS	674 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	587 FPS
4K
low	592 FPS	636 FPS
medium	531 FPS	568 FPS
high	461 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9474F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

EPYC 9474F

The EPYC 9474F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 102,255 points. Launch price was $6,780.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 99,152 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9474F packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9474F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9474F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 9474F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9474F scores 102,255 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X's 99,152 — a 3.1% lead for the EPYC 9474F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9474F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+50%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.3 GHz+29%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	102,255+3%	99,152
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	75,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	24,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9474F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 197.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9474F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9474F) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) — the EPYC 9474F offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9474F) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X).

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Socket	SP5	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+500%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	12+200%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+39%	92

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9474F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). Primary use case: EPYC 9474F targets Data Center / Performance Optimized, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X targets High-End Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9474F rivals Xeon 8461V; Ryzen Threadripper 7970X rivals Xeon w7-2495X.

Feature	EPYC 9474F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Performance Optimized	High-End Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9474F launched at $6780 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X debuted at $2499. On MSRP ($6780 vs $2499), the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is $4281 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9474F delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X the 89.8% better value option.