
EPYC 7663
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7663
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 280W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,380 vs 22,045).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,376 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 240W.
EPYC 7663
2021Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 280W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,376 less on MSRP ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.0 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $6,366 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,380 vs 22,045).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($6,366 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 240W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3990X better than EPYC 7663?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 584 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 836 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 954 FPS | 942 FPS |
| medium | 863 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 739 FPS | 724 FPS |
| ultra | 637 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 733 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7663 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

EPYC 7663
EPYC 7663
The EPYC 7663 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 82,120 points. Launch price was $6,366.


Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7663 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7663 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7663 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7663 scores 82,120 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 7663. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,370 vs 1,961, a 35.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,380 vs 22,045 (56.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7663 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
| Feature | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 56 / 112 | 64 / 128+14% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 82,120+3% | 79,889 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 64,366 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,370 | 1,961+43% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,380 | 22,045+78% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7663 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7663 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7663) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7663) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) — the EPYC 7663 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7663) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).
| Feature | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+1500% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7663) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Primary use case: EPYC 7663 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7663 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7663 launched at $6366 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X debuted at $3990. On MSRP ($6366 vs $3990), the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is $2376 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7663 delivers 12.9 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X the 43.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7663 | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6366 | $3990-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 20.0+55% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












