PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $990 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 186.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 39.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 280W, a 155W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 34,260).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌124% higher power demand at 280W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $990 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 186.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 39.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 280W, a 155W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 34,260).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌124% higher power demand at 280W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3960X better than Core i7-13700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 3960X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 30 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is the better fit. You are getting 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 242.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,399 MSRP versus $409 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700K is also 186.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 39.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	284 FPS	270 FPS
medium	268 FPS	222 FPS
high	223 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	211 FPS
medium	200 FPS	164 FPS
high	159 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	98 FPS
medium	134 FPS	81 FPS
high	103 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	51 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	689 FPS	835 FPS
medium	580 FPS	706 FPS
high	484 FPS	547 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	677 FPS
medium	525 FPS	587 FPS
high	441 FPS	476 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	396 FPS
medium	314 FPS	345 FPS
high	295 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	271 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	648 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	530 FPS	927 FPS
high	467 FPS	862 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	765 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	777 FPS
medium	491 FPS	645 FPS
high	427 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	506 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	540 FPS
medium	374 FPS	428 FPS
high	339 FPS	381 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	306 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	970 FPS	1325 FPS
medium	883 FPS	1015 FPS
high	766 FPS	1074 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	1032 FPS
medium	740 FPS	900 FPS
high	642 FPS	778 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	744 FPS
medium	515 FPS	662 FPS
high	463 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 — a 17.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 34,260 (10% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,270, a 76.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+20%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	128 MB+327%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	45,784	54,763+20%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	34,260+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+124%	1,270
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Socket	LGA1700	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X debuted at $1399. On MSRP ($409 vs $1399), the Core i7-13700K is $990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 39.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — making the Core i7-13700K the 96.4% better value option.