PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7443P

2021

Why buy it

✅+3.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.5 vs 39.1 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +51.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (54,763 vs 56,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.1 vs 42.5 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

EPYC 7443P

2021

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

2019

Why buy it

✅+3.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.5 vs 39.1 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +51.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (54,763 vs 56,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.1 vs 42.5 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7443P better than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is ahead with a 51.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7443P pulls ahead with 3.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7443P is the better fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7443P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 7443P is $62 cheaper on MSRP at $1,337 MSRP versus $1,399 MSRP, and it gives you 3.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 51.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 8.5% better value on MSRP (42.5 vs 39.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7443P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 24/48. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7443P Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	170 FPS	270 FPS
medium	141 FPS	222 FPS
high	120 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	211 FPS
medium	120 FPS	164 FPS
high	95 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	98 FPS
medium	59 FPS	81 FPS
high	47 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	51 FPS

Open EPYC 7443P Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	506 FPS	835 FPS
medium	442 FPS	706 FPS
high	354 FPS	547 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	417 FPS	677 FPS
medium	373 FPS	587 FPS
high	307 FPS	476 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	256 FPS	396 FPS
medium	233 FPS	345 FPS
high	205 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	271 FPS

Open EPYC 7443P Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	725 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	619 FPS	927 FPS
high	572 FPS	862 FPS
ultra	504 FPS	765 FPS
1440p
low	543 FPS	777 FPS
medium	461 FPS	645 FPS
high	419 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	363 FPS	506 FPS
4K
low	400 FPS	540 FPS
medium	322 FPS	428 FPS
high	284 FPS	381 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	306 FPS

Open EPYC 7443P Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1080p
low	915 FPS	1325 FPS
medium	830 FPS	1015 FPS
high	715 FPS	1074 FPS
ultra	632 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	1032 FPS
medium	633 FPS	900 FPS
high	542 FPS	778 FPS
ultra	469 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	744 FPS
medium	468 FPS	662 FPS
high	411 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 7443P Open Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

EPYC 7443P

The EPYC 7443P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,808 points. Launch price was $1,337.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7443P and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X (base: 2.85 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7443P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7443P scores 56,808 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 — a 3.7% lead for the EPYC 7443P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.

Feature	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.85 GHz	3.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	128 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	56,808+4%	54,763
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	34,260
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,270

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7443P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7443P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — the EPYC 7443P supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7443P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7443P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7443P) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) — the EPYC 7443P offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7443P) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).

Feature	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	256 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7443P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7443P rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.

Feature	EPYC 7443P	Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7443P launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X debuted at $1399. On MSRP ($1337 vs $1399), the EPYC 7443P is $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7443P delivers 42.5 pts/$ vs 39.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — making the EPYC 7443P the 8.2% better value option.