
Ryzen 7 8700G
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 441.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.2 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+84.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 96.2 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8700G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 441.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.2 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+84.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 96.2 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8700G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8700G better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 791 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 640 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 577 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 609 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 791 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 799 FPS |
| high | 791 FPS | 704 FPS |
| ultra | 756 FPS | 616 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 791 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 764 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 661 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX


Ryzen 7 8700G
Ryzen 7 8700G
The Ryzen 7 8700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,649 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8700G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700G versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700G uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700G scores 31,649 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 33,213 (59.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,720 vs 1,206, a 77.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,326 vs 7,612 (61.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700G vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+21% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 64 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-67% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 31,649 | 31,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000 | 33,213+85% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,720+126% | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,326+88% | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8700G uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700G versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — the Ryzen 7 8700G supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700G) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700G) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700G) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8700G supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 8700G includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700G targets High-end Desktop APU, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700G rivals Core i7-13700; Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-end Desktop APU | Extreme Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 8700G launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX debuted at $1799. On MSRP ($329 vs $1799), the Ryzen 7 8700G is $1470 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700G delivers 96.2 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Ryzen 7 8700G the 137.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8700G | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-82% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.2+440% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











