
Core i9-10980XE
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10980XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +58.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($979 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.9 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($979 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,309 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+36.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 48.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980XE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
Core i9-10980XE
2019Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +58.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($979 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.9 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($979 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+36.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 48.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,309 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980XE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10980XE better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 805 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 805 FPS | 640 FPS |
| high | 805 FPS | 577 FPS |
| ultra | 805 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 805 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 805 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 768 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 805 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 805 FPS | 799 FPS |
| high | 787 FPS | 704 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 616 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 805 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 630 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10980XE and Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Core i9-10980XE
Core i9-10980XE
The Core i9-10980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 32,187 points. Launch price was $979.


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980XE packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10980XE versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980XE (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-10980XE uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980XE scores 32,187 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10980XE. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,309 vs 33,213 (31% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,242 vs 1,206, a 2.9% lead for the Core i9-10980XE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,275 vs 7,612 (72.5% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980XE vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 32 / 64+78% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total) | 64 MB+159% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 32,187 | 31,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,309 | 33,213+37% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,242+3% | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,275+114% | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Core i9-10980XE) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10980XE) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-10980XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-10980XE) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10980XE launched at $979 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX debuted at $1799. On MSRP ($979 vs $1799), the Core i9-10980XE is $820 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10980XE delivers 32.9 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Core i9-10980XE the 59.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $979-46% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.9+85% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











