
Core i7-13700HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,314 less on MSRP ($485 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($485 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,945 vs 32,157).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 66.3 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700HX
2023Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,314 less on MSRP ($485 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($485 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,945 vs 32,157).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 66.3 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 768 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 640 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 577 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 804 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 804 FPS | 799 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 704 FPS |
| ultra | 635 FPS | 616 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 691 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 599 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700HX and Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Core i7-13700HX
Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+19% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 32,157 | 31,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 33,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — the Core i7-13700HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i7-13700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700HX launched at $485 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX debuted at $1799. On MSRP ($485 vs $1799), the Core i7-13700HX is $1314 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700HX delivers 66.3 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Core i7-13700HX the 115.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $485-73% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+272% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











