
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 21,444).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+15.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 32.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+15.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 21,444).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($899 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 735 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 491 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 715 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 607 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 213 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 857 FPS | 509 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 786 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 558 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 857 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 636 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 857 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 669 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 500 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 364 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 15.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 21,444 (14.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 1,255, a 73.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 8,814 (52% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+14% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+26% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+200% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-58% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 34,293+16% | 29,462 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | 21,444+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+115% | 1,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+70% | 8,814 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X debuted at $899. On MSRP ($449 vs $899), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $450 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 32.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 79.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-50% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+133% | 32.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












