PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,384 vs 21,444).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅+10.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13905H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Core i9-13905H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13905H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13905H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+10.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 12.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,384 vs 21,444).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13905H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Core i9-13905H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13905H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13905H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13905H better than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13905H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the better fit. You are getting 10.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13905H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-13905H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $899 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 10.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13905H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13905H Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	262 FPS	200 FPS
medium	253 FPS	175 FPS
high	210 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	157 FPS
medium	192 FPS	131 FPS
high	154 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	83 FPS
medium	132 FPS	74 FPS
high	101 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i9-13905H Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	636 FPS	532 FPS
medium	543 FPS	463 FPS
high	458 FPS	395 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	471 FPS
medium	492 FPS	417 FPS
high	416 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	325 FPS	302 FPS
medium	296 FPS	267 FPS
high	279 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	213 FPS

Open Core i9-13905H Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	648 FPS	737 FPS
medium	530 FPS	630 FPS
high	467 FPS	584 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	509 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	632 FPS
medium	491 FPS	525 FPS
high	427 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	410 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	461 FPS
medium	374 FPS	371 FPS
high	339 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	274 FPS

Open Core i9-13905H Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
1080p
low	745 FPS	737 FPS
medium	745 FPS	737 FPS
high	745 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	672 FPS	636 FPS
1440p
low	745 FPS	737 FPS
medium	723 FPS	667 FPS
high	626 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	500 FPS
4K
low	555 FPS	515 FPS
medium	504 FPS	468 FPS
high	451 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i9-13905H Open Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-13905H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 21,444 (10.1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 1,255, a 58.8% lead for the Core i9-13905H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 8,814 (45.5% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+23%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.5 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	29,807+1%	29,462
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,384	21,444+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,300+83%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+59%	8,814

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13905H versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Core i9-13905H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13905H) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Core i9-13905H	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket	FCBGA1792	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	256 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	12	64+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). The Core i9-13905H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS.