PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-14490F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $790 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 380.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 132.2 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 12,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 132.2 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-14490F

2024

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $790 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 380.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 132.2 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 12,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 132.2 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14490F better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-14490F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-14490F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.6% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14490F is the better fit. You are getting 33.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-14490F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-14490F is $790 cheaper on MSRP at $209 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.6% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 380.3% better value on MSRP (132.2 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14490F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-14490F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	246 FPS	198 FPS
medium	231 FPS	172 FPS
high	196 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	155 FPS
medium	183 FPS	129 FPS
high	151 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	149 FPS	69 FPS
medium	127 FPS	61 FPS
high	98 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	645 FPS	407 FPS
medium	549 FPS	365 FPS
high	464 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	555 FPS	348 FPS
medium	493 FPS	318 FPS
high	418 FPS	272 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	224 FPS
medium	293 FPS	204 FPS
high	279 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	150 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	691 FPS	687 FPS
medium	691 FPS	687 FPS
high	691 FPS	687 FPS
ultra	691 FPS	687 FPS
1440p
low	691 FPS	687 FPS
medium	691 FPS	687 FPS
high	691 FPS	656 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	584 FPS
4K
low	596 FPS	519 FPS
medium	502 FPS	428 FPS
high	447 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	321 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
1080p
low	691 FPS	687 FPS
medium	691 FPS	687 FPS
high	691 FPS	687 FPS
ultra	691 FPS	640 FPS
1440p
low	691 FPS	687 FPS
medium	691 FPS	687 FPS
high	691 FPS	611 FPS
ultra	592 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	661 FPS	578 FPS
medium	585 FPS	517 FPS
high	514 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	382 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14490F and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Core i5-14490F

The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-14490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14490F scores 27,621 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-14490F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,600 vs 1,040, a 85.7% lead for the Core i5-14490F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 9,000 (28.6% advantage for the Core i5-14490F). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+25%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	27,621	27,487
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,510	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,600+150%	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,000+33%	9,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-14490F versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Core i5-14490F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-14490F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14490F) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-14490F) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).

Feature	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14490F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). Primary use case: Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Mid-Range	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-14490F launched at $209 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X debuted at $999. On MSRP ($209 vs $999), the Core i5-14490F is $790 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14490F delivers 132.2 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — making the Core i5-14490F the 131.1% better value option.