PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 8645HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1950 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,316 vs 18,780).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅+41% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8645HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8645HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 8645HS

2023

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1950 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+41% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,316 vs 18,780).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8645HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8645HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8645HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8645HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 8645HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the better fit. You are getting 41% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 8645HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 8645HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 41% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 8645HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 8645HS Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 8645HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	265 FPS	173 FPS
medium	239 FPS	153 FPS
high	200 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	234 FPS	139 FPS
medium	191 FPS	117 FPS
high	156 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	162 FPS	65 FPS
medium	135 FPS	59 FPS
high	104 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 8645HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 8645HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	426 FPS	336 FPS
medium	353 FPS	304 FPS
high	308 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	271 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	369 FPS	287 FPS
medium	320 FPS	264 FPS
high	281 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	265 FPS	184 FPS
medium	235 FPS	169 FPS
high	218 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	115 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 8645HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 8645HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	556 FPS	552 FPS
medium	556 FPS	505 FPS
high	556 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	556 FPS	407 FPS
1440p
low	556 FPS	531 FPS
medium	556 FPS	439 FPS
high	520 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	449 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	401 FPS
medium	445 FPS	318 FPS
high	380 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	315 FPS	234 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 8645HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 8645HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	556 FPS	552 FPS
medium	556 FPS	552 FPS
high	556 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	556 FPS	487 FPS
1440p
low	556 FPS	552 FPS
medium	556 FPS	535 FPS
high	556 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	545 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	556 FPS	416 FPS
medium	506 FPS	382 FPS
high	450 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	295 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 8645HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8645HS and Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Ryzen 5 8645HS

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 8645HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 22,257 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8645HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,316 vs 18,780 (34% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,574 vs 1,961, a 27% lead for the Ryzen 5 8645HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,675 vs 10,100 (5.5% advantage for the Ryzen 5 8645HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950.

Feature	Ryzen 5 8645HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+56%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+34%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,257	22,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,316	18,780+41%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,574+31%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,675+6%	10,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 5 8645HS versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — the Ryzen 5 8645HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 8645HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 8645HS) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950).

Feature	Ryzen 5 8645HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Socket	FP8	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-7500+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 8645HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). The Ryzen 5 8645HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H; Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.