PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $609 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 155.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 10,100).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $609 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 155.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 10,100).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700TE better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700TE is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700TE is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700TE is $609 cheaper on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 155.6% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700TE Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	254 FPS	173 FPS
medium	239 FPS	153 FPS
high	202 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	139 FPS
medium	186 FPS	117 FPS
high	151 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	149 FPS	65 FPS
medium	127 FPS	59 FPS
high	98 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-13700TE Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	327 FPS	336 FPS
medium	279 FPS	304 FPS
high	234 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	212 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	271 FPS	287 FPS
medium	240 FPS	264 FPS
high	207 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	178 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	184 FPS
medium	150 FPS	169 FPS
high	141 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	115 FPS

Open Core i7-13700TE Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	551 FPS	552 FPS
medium	551 FPS	505 FPS
high	551 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	551 FPS	407 FPS
1440p
low	551 FPS	531 FPS
medium	551 FPS	439 FPS
high	551 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	551 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	551 FPS	401 FPS
medium	494 FPS	318 FPS
high	439 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	234 FPS

Open Core i7-13700TE Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	551 FPS	552 FPS
medium	551 FPS	552 FPS
high	551 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	551 FPS	487 FPS
1440p
low	551 FPS	552 FPS
medium	551 FPS	535 FPS
high	551 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	551 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	551 FPS	416 FPS
medium	551 FPS	382 FPS
high	523 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	295 FPS

Open Core i7-13700TE Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700TE and Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Core i7-13700TE

The Core i7-13700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,026 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-13700TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700TE (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700TE scores 22,026 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,961, a 2% lead for the Core i7-13700TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 10,100 (1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700TE vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+50%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+191%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,026	22,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,780
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000+2%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	10,100+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700TE versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — the Core i7-13700TE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700TE) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700TE) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-13700TE) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950).

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-13700TE) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). The Core i7-13700TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700TE targets Embedded, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V
Target Use	Embedded	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700TE launched at $390 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 debuted at $999. On MSRP ($390 vs $999), the Core i7-13700TE is $609 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700TE delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — making the Core i7-13700TE the 87.5% better value option.