PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900HX

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $533 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 202.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,198).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 83.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 5900HX

2021

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $533 less on MSRP ($266 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 202.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($266 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,198).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 83.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $266 MSRP).
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900HX better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900HX is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900HX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900HX is $533 cheaper on MSRP at $266 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 202.2% better value on MSRP (83.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900HX Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	189 FPS	175 FPS
medium	156 FPS	156 FPS
high	127 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	143 FPS
medium	129 FPS	121 FPS
high	104 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	65 FPS
medium	77 FPS	59 FPS
high	61 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	37 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900HX Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	555 FPS	398 FPS
medium	466 FPS	357 FPS
high	394 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	252 FPS
1440p
low	497 FPS	339 FPS
medium	417 FPS	309 FPS
high	358 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	342 FPS	217 FPS
medium	295 FPS	197 FPS
high	269 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	145 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900HX Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	555 FPS	552 FPS
medium	555 FPS	539 FPS
high	555 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	555 FPS	552 FPS
medium	546 FPS	464 FPS
high	488 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	431 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	420 FPS
medium	404 FPS	334 FPS
high	354 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	252 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900HX Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	555 FPS	552 FPS
medium	555 FPS	552 FPS
high	555 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	555 FPS	552 FPS
medium	555 FPS	552 FPS
high	555 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	423 FPS
4K
low	528 FPS	444 FPS
medium	476 FPS	408 FPS
high	415 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	353 FPS	318 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900HX Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900HX and Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen 9 5900HX

The Ryzen 9 5900HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,198 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900HX packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900HX versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 19% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900HX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900HX uses the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 22,198 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900HX. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5900HX vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+21%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,198	22,066
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,955	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,845	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,587	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900HX uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Socket	FP6	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900HX) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). The Ryzen 9 5900HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 8), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900HX targets Gaming Laptop / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900HX rivals Core i9-11980HK.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900HX	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon RX Vega 8	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Gaming Laptop / Mobile Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900HX launched at $266 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($266 vs $799), the Ryzen 9 5900HX is $533 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900HX delivers 83.5 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen 9 5900HX the 100.5% better value option.