EPYC 7203P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7203P

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,017 vs 22,066).

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while EPYC 7203P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.

EPYC 7203P

2023

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 140W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,017 vs 22,066).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while EPYC 7203P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than EPYC 7203P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is at an unclear MSRP at $799 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7203P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7203P Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7203P	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	154 FPS	175 FPS
medium	126 FPS	156 FPS
high	106 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	143 FPS
medium	112 FPS	121 FPS
high	88 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	65 FPS
medium	57 FPS	59 FPS
high	44 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	37 FPS

Open EPYC 7203P Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7203P	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	393 FPS	398 FPS
medium	349 FPS	357 FPS
high	287 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	252 FPS
1440p
low	332 FPS	339 FPS
medium	300 FPS	309 FPS
high	254 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	205 FPS	217 FPS
medium	188 FPS	197 FPS
high	160 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	145 FPS

Open EPYC 7203P Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7203P	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	525 FPS	539 FPS
high	468 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	498 FPS	552 FPS
medium	405 FPS	464 FPS
high	355 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	361 FPS	420 FPS
medium	282 FPS	334 FPS
high	241 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	252 FPS

Open EPYC 7203P Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7203P	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	550 FPS	552 FPS
high	550 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	550 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	550 FPS	552 FPS
high	521 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	447 FPS	423 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	444 FPS
medium	445 FPS	408 FPS
high	390 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	318 FPS

Open EPYC 7203P Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7203P and Ryzen Threadripper 1920

EPYC 7203P

The EPYC 7203P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,017 points. Launch price was $348.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7203P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7203P versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7203P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7203P scores 22,017 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7203P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	EPYC 7203P	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,017	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7203P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.