
Core i5-9500T
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-9500T
2019Why buy it
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1756B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,095 vs 8,107).
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 42.2 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-9500T.
Core i5-9500T
2019Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1756B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,095 vs 8,107).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 42.2 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-9500T.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V1756B better than Core i5-9500T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 203 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9500T and Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Core i5-9500T
Core i5-9500T
The Core i5-9500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,095 points. Launch price was $192.


Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9500T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-9500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-9500T versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-9500T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Core i5-9500T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9500T scores 8,095 against the Ryzen Embedded V1756B's 8,107 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9500T vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B.
| Feature | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.25 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total)+350% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 8,095 | 8,107 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,236 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,218 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9500T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9500T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1756B). The Core i5-9500T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9500T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-9500T rivals Ryzen 5 2600.
| Feature | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-9500T launched at $192 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B debuted at $250. On MSRP ($192 vs $250), the Core i5-9500T is $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9500T delivers 42.2 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — making the Core i5-9500T the 26.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-9500T | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-23% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.2+30% | 32.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












