Core i5-1145GRE vs Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Intel

Core i5-1145GRE

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-1145GRE

2020

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1756B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $112 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
  • Delivers 43.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,107 vs 8,207).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1145GRE better than Ryzen Embedded V1756B?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded V1756B is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1145GRE pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i5-1145GRE also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1145GRE is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-1145GRE is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core i5-1145GRE is 44.8% more expensive on MSRP at $362 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it gives you 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen Embedded V1756B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1145GRE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018), 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
1080p
low168 FPS177 FPS
medium136 FPS154 FPS
high109 FPS126 FPS
ultra84 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS147 FPS
medium116 FPS124 FPS
high92 FPS98 FPS
ultra71 FPS76 FPS
4K
low66 FPS65 FPS
medium56 FPS58 FPS
high44 FPS46 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
1080p
low147 FPS175 FPS
medium127 FPS153 FPS
high116 FPS143 FPS
ultra100 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low130 FPS148 FPS
medium113 FPS129 FPS
high106 FPS120 FPS
ultra90 FPS95 FPS
4K
low102 FPS109 FPS
medium92 FPS98 FPS
high78 FPS74 FPS
ultra66 FPS52 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
1080p
low205 FPS203 FPS
medium205 FPS203 FPS
high205 FPS203 FPS
ultra205 FPS203 FPS
1440p
low205 FPS203 FPS
medium205 FPS203 FPS
high205 FPS203 FPS
ultra205 FPS203 FPS
4K
low205 FPS203 FPS
medium205 FPS203 FPS
high205 FPS203 FPS
ultra205 FPS203 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
1080p
low205 FPS203 FPS
medium205 FPS203 FPS
high205 FPS203 FPS
ultra205 FPS203 FPS
1440p
low205 FPS203 FPS
medium205 FPS203 FPS
high205 FPS203 FPS
ultra205 FPS203 FPS
4K
low205 FPS203 FPS
medium205 FPS203 FPS
high205 FPS203 FPS
ultra205 FPS203 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1145GRE and Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Intel

Core i5-1145GRE

The Core i5-1145GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $362.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1145GRE and Ryzen Embedded V1756B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-1145GRE versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i5-1145GRE (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Core i5-1145GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1145GRE scores 8,207 against the Ryzen Embedded V1756B's 8,107 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-1145GRE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1145GRE vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B.

FeatureCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+14%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.25 GHz+117%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+300%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
8,207+1%
8,107
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1145GRE uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
Socket
FCBGA1449
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-1145GRE launched at $362 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B debuted at $250. On MSRP ($362 vs $250), the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1145GRE delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1756B the 35.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-1145GRERyzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP
$362
$250-31%
Performance per Dollar
22.7
32.4+43%
Release Date
2020
2018