
Core i5-1145GRE
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1145GRE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1756B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,107 vs 8,207).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Core i5-1145GRE
2020Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $362 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1756B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($362 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,107 vs 8,207).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1145GRE better than Ryzen Embedded V1756B?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 203 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1145GRE and Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Core i5-1145GRE
Core i5-1145GRE
The Core i5-1145GRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 8,207 points. Launch price was $362.


Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-1145GRE and Ryzen Embedded V1756B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-1145GRE versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i5-1145GRE (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). The Core i5-1145GRE uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1145GRE scores 8,207 against the Ryzen Embedded V1756B's 8,107 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-1145GRE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1145GRE vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B.
| Feature | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+14% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.25 GHz+117% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+300% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 8,207+1% | 8,107 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1145GRE uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-1145GRE launched at $362 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1756B debuted at $250. On MSRP ($362 vs $250), the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1145GRE delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1756B the 35.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-1145GRE | Ryzen Embedded V1756B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $362 | $250-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.7 | 32.4+43% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












