
Core i5-13450HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13450HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,869).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i5-13450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-13450HX
2023Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,869).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i5-13450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 better than Core i5-13450HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 554 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 622 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 517 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13450HX and Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

Core i5-13450HX
Core i5-13450HX
The Core i5-13450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,869 points. Launch price was $326.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13450HX packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13450HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13450HX versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13450HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13450HX scores 24,869 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's 24,613 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-13450HX. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13450HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 24,869+1% | 24,613 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13450HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13450HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












