
Core i5-12600HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,396 vs 24,613).
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i5-12600HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12600HX
2022Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,396 vs 24,613).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i5-12600HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 better than Core i5-12600HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 554 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 563 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600HX and Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

Core i5-12600HX
Core i5-12600HX
The Core i5-12600HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,396 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600HX packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12600HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12600HX versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-12600HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12600HX scores 24,396 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's 24,613 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 24,396 | 24,613 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,434 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12600HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12600HX) / not specified (Ryzen AI Max PRO 380). The Core i5-12600HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600HX targets Workstation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800H.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Workstation Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











