PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700K.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 31,000).

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700K.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 31,000).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen AI Max 385?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 87.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 41.9% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 87.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max 385 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	284 FPS	257 FPS
medium	268 FPS	234 FPS
high	223 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	222 FPS
medium	200 FPS	183 FPS
high	159 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	154 FPS
medium	134 FPS	127 FPS
high	103 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	689 FPS	592 FPS
medium	580 FPS	500 FPS
high	484 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	346 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	508 FPS
medium	525 FPS	452 FPS
high	441 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	303 FPS
medium	314 FPS	273 FPS
high	295 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	648 FPS	780 FPS
medium	530 FPS	611 FPS
high	467 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	676 FPS
medium	491 FPS	534 FPS
high	427 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	476 FPS
medium	374 FPS	394 FPS
high	339 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	288 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max 385

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	970 FPS	807 FPS
medium	883 FPS	807 FPS
high	766 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	700 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	796 FPS
medium	740 FPS	706 FPS
high	642 FPS	619 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	536 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	554 FPS
medium	515 FPS	499 FPS
high	463 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	389 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen AI Max 385

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 34.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 16,500 (61.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,800, a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 14,000 (30.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+8%	5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	45,784+42%	32,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000+88%	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+2%	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+36%	14,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket	LGA1700	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max 385
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	AMD-V
Target Use	—	High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($409 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 385 is $409 cheaper.