PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 385 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (32,157 vs 32,274).
❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700HX.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700HX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 385 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (32,157 vs 32,274).
❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max 385 better than Core i7-13700HX?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Ryzen AI Max 385 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $485 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700HX only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 15.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700HX Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max 385 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	264 FPS	257 FPS
medium	254 FPS	234 FPS
high	210 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	222 FPS
medium	193 FPS	183 FPS
high	153 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	154 FPS
medium	131 FPS	127 FPS
high	101 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i7-13700HX Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	340 FPS	592 FPS
medium	291 FPS	500 FPS
high	245 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	223 FPS	346 FPS
1440p
low	295 FPS	508 FPS
medium	264 FPS	452 FPS
high	223 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	176 FPS	303 FPS
medium	159 FPS	273 FPS
high	151 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i7-13700HX Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	647 FPS	780 FPS
medium	527 FPS	611 FPS
high	467 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	676 FPS
medium	486 FPS	534 FPS
high	425 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	476 FPS
medium	372 FPS	394 FPS
high	333 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	285 FPS	288 FPS

Open Core i7-13700HX Open Ryzen AI Max 385

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	804 FPS	807 FPS
medium	804 FPS	807 FPS
high	715 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	635 FPS	700 FPS
1440p
low	778 FPS	796 FPS
medium	691 FPS	706 FPS
high	599 FPS	619 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	536 FPS
4K
low	547 FPS	554 FPS
medium	497 FPS	499 FPS
high	443 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	389 FPS

Open Core i7-13700HX Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700HX and Ryzen AI Max 385

Core i7-13700HX

The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	32,157	32,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	14,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket	FCBGA1964	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-13700HX) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700HX launched at $485 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($485 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 385 is $485 cheaper.