
M2 Pro
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,939 vs 22,051).
- β28.6% higher power demand at 36W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 28W instead of 36W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M2 Pro
2023Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 28W instead of 36W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,939 vs 22,051).
- β28.6% higher power demand at 36W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while M2 Pro can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 better than M2 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 388 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Pro and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
M2 Pro
M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,051 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the M2 Pro has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 β a 35.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (base: 2.42 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is built on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 22,051 β a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12+50% | 8 / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 5 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz+21% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+200% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | β | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 22,051 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,650 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,450 | β |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Apple M2 Pro GPU | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | ARM Virtualization | β |
| Target Use | Professional Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












