
M1 Max
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M1 Max
2021Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β +500% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with M1 Max GPU, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,146).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 48 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while M1 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M1 Max
2021Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β +500% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 8 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with M1 Max GPU, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,146).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 48 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while M1 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M1 Max better than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 532 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 388 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 Max and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
M1 Max
M1 Max
The M1 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,146 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,051 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M1 Max packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the M1 Max has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Max versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 β a 43.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (base: 2.06 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is built on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Max scores 22,146 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 22,051 β a 0.4% lead for the M1 Max. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M1 Max vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| Feature | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 5 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 2.06 GHz+3% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB+500% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+2700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | β | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,146 | 22,051 |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 8 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: ARM-V (M1 Max) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360). The M1 Max includes integrated graphics (M1 Max GPU), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Max targets Mobile Workstation.
| Feature | M1 Max | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | M1 Max GPU | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | ARM-V | β |
| Target Use | Mobile Workstation | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











