
Core i9-11900F
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11900F
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,052).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Core i9-11900F
2021Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,052).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900F better than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 551 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 388 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F
The Core i9-11900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,052 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,051 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-11900F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-11900F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-11900F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900F scores 22,052 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 22,051 — a 0% lead for the Core i9-11900F. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| Feature | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,052 | 22,051 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900F | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












