Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (23,934 vs 24,044).

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

2025

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is ahead with a 18.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
1080p
low256 FPS245 FPS
medium236 FPS228 FPS
high202 FPS194 FPS
ultra172 FPS167 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS215 FPS
medium188 FPS181 FPS
high155 FPS149 FPS
ultra135 FPS132 FPS
4K
low154 FPS149 FPS
medium129 FPS126 FPS
high100 FPS98 FPS
ultra87 FPS85 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
1080p
low472 FPS212 FPS
medium396 FPS183 FPS
high345 FPS166 FPS
ultra308 FPS147 FPS
1440p
low413 FPS190 FPS
medium365 FPS170 FPS
high318 FPS154 FPS
ultra272 FPS131 FPS
4K
low274 FPS143 FPS
medium253 FPS132 FPS
high241 FPS126 FPS
ultra208 FPS107 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
1080p
low598 FPS601 FPS
medium598 FPS595 FPS
high598 FPS512 FPS
ultra598 FPS408 FPS
1440p
low598 FPS601 FPS
medium598 FPS506 FPS
high533 FPS435 FPS
ultra452 FPS353 FPS
4K
low518 FPS436 FPS
medium448 FPS368 FPS
high398 FPS322 FPS
ultra336 FPS261 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
1080p
low598 FPS601 FPS
medium598 FPS601 FPS
high598 FPS601 FPS
ultra598 FPS601 FPS
1440p
low598 FPS601 FPS
medium598 FPS601 FPS
high598 FPS588 FPS
ultra597 FPS506 FPS
4K
low595 FPS530 FPS
medium535 FPS478 FPS
high480 FPS425 FPS
ultra418 FPS369 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,934 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 23,934 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 24,044 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+2%
5 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+65%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+100%
8 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Krackan Point (2025)
PassMark
23,934
24,044
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,450
Geekbench 6 Single
2,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
Socket
FP7
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U rivals Core Ultra 7 164U.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 8840URyzen AI 7 PRO 350
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming