
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,934 vs 24,044).
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,934 vs 24,044).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 533 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,934 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 23,934 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 24,044 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+65% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 23,934 | 24,044 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U rivals Core Ultra 7 164U.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











