
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,216).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
2024Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,044 vs 24,216).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,216 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 24,216 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 24,044 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 24,216 | 24,044 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G launched at $300 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($300 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is $300 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.7 | — |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











