
Core i5-1135G7
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1135G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,414 vs 24,044).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +101.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1135G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1135G7
2020Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +101.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,414 vs 24,044).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1135G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 better than Core i5-1135G7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1135G7 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Core i5-1135G7
Core i5-1135G7
The Core i5-1135G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,414 points. Launch price was $309.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,044 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1135G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1135G7 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1135G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1135G7 scores 9,414 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 24,044 — a 87.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1135G7 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.
| Feature | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 9,414 | 24,044+155% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,183 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,592 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,495 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1135G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1135G7) / not specified (Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350). The Core i5-1135G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1135G7 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-1135G7 rivals Ryzen 5 5500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1135G7 | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











