
Core i7-7800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-7800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 36.6 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.6 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,794 vs 12,963).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8.3 MB).
Core i7-7800X
2017Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.6 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 36.6 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,794 vs 12,963).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8.3 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 5 330 better than Core i7-7800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7800X and Ryzen AI 5 330

Core i7-7800X
Core i7-7800X
The Core i7-7800X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 12,963 points. Launch price was $383.


Ryzen AI 5 330
Ryzen AI 5 330
The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7800X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-7800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7800X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 330 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-7800X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses Krackan Point 2 (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7800X scores 12,963 against the Ryzen AI 5 330's 12,794 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-7800X. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total) on the Core i7-7800X vs 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330.
| Feature | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8.25 MB (total)+106% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Krackan Point 2 (2025) |
| PassMark | 12,963+1% | 12,794 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,897 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,114 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,951 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7800X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-7800X) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 330).
| Feature | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-7800X launched at $383 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 debuted at $350. On MSRP ($383 vs $350), the Ryzen AI 5 330 is $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7800X delivers 33.8 pts/$ vs 36.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 5 330 — making the Ryzen AI 5 330 the 7.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7800X | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $383 | $350-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8 | 36.6+8% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











