
Core i5-1235U
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1235U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Ryzen AI 5 330 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,740 vs 12,794).
Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1235U across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Core i5-1235U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1235U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1235U
2022Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Ryzen AI 5 330 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,740 vs 12,794).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1235U across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Core i5-1235U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1235U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 5 330 better than Core i5-1235U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1235U and Ryzen AI 5 330

Core i5-1235U
Core i5-1235U
The Core i5-1235U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,740 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen AI 5 330
Ryzen AI 5 330
The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1235U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-1235U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1235U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 330 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1235U uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses Krackan Point 2 (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1235U scores 12,740 against the Ryzen AI 5 330's 12,794 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 330. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1235U vs 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330.
| Feature | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Krackan Point 2 (2025) |
| PassMark | 12,740 | 12,794 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,095 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1235U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1235U) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 330). The Core i5-1235U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1235U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1235U rivals Ryzen 5 6600U.
| Feature | Core i5-1235U | Ryzen AI 5 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











