PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Why buy it

✅+17% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,905 vs 33,820).

Core i9-14900F

2024

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

2023

Why buy it

✅+17% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,905 vs 33,820).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Core i9-14900F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is ahead with a 36.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900F pulls ahead with 17% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900F is the better fit. You are getting 17% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is $115 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $524 MSRP, and it gives you a 36.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i9-14900F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 17% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 28.1% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 89.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i9-14900F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-14900F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	318 FPS	269 FPS
medium	309 FPS	244 FPS
high	244 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	276 FPS	260 FPS
medium	238 FPS	212 FPS
high	176 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	180 FPS
medium	162 FPS	147 FPS
high	121 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	98 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	497 FPS	660 FPS
medium	436 FPS	567 FPS
high	355 FPS	426 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	368 FPS
1440p
low	422 FPS	555 FPS
medium	381 FPS	495 FPS
high	317 FPS	384 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	236 FPS	313 FPS
medium	217 FPS	283 FPS
high	206 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	214 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	760 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	624 FPS	1118 FPS
high	541 FPS	1041 FPS
ultra	465 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	680 FPS	940 FPS
medium	567 FPS	836 FPS
high	485 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	500 FPS	574 FPS
medium	439 FPS	495 FPS
high	391 FPS	445 FPS
ultra	334 FPS	378 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
1080p
low	990 FPS	1171 FPS
medium	886 FPS	1015 FPS
high	774 FPS	981 FPS
ultra	688 FPS	854 FPS
1440p
low	821 FPS	1019 FPS
medium	723 FPS	888 FPS
high	631 FPS	762 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	639 FPS
4K
low	606 FPS	754 FPS
medium	543 FPS	658 FPS
high	480 FPS	569 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Core i9-14900F

The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 33,820 vs 28,905 (15.7% advantage for the Core i9-14900F). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+4%	5.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	46,825	46,828
Cinebench R23 Multi	33,820+17%	28,905
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,206
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i9-14900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900F) vs true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i9-14900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-14900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 debuted at $409. On MSRP ($524 vs $409), the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 89.4 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 24.7% better value option.