
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+7.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,905 vs 31,000).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅+7.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,905 vs 31,000).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 1118 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 1041 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 940 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1171 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 981 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 854 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 1019 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 888 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 28,905 (7% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,206, a 25.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 16,832 (12% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 46,828+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+7% | 28,905 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+29% | 2,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+13% | 16,832 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 debuted at $409. On MSRP ($409 vs $409), the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 2.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9 | 114.5+2% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












