
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1212.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 105W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 105W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 16,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1212.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 3.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 16,000 (4.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 2,605, a 10.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 10,348 (28.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+2% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB+33% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 28,325+4% | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | 16,000+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900+11% | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800+33% | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












