
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+9.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,605 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+9.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,605 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 50.5% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 16,000 (63.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,605, a 8.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 10,348 (58.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+4% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784+68% | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+94% | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+9% | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+83% | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












